Hybrids ! Get them off the HOV lanes !! |
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 8> |
Author | |
spolastre
New Slug Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I didn't know that. Thank you. Now I am really going to start having signs all over my car that say "Death to Hybrids." JK. [:o)]
quote: |
|
Stuck2
New Slug Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't think you mean "death to hybrids" but "death to exemptions" for everyone who doesn't comply with HOV-3 (I think police and motorcycles should get off the road too). Hybrids do get better gas mileage, but they aren't what they are advertised to be. It's a step in the right direction for more fuel efficient autos.
|
|
Uhura
New Slug Joined: 10 Feb 2004 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
quote: Wow-I didn't know that! Do you happen to know of a website etc where I could read about this? Live Long and Prosper |
|
Wagonman
New Slug Joined: 05 Aug 2003 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
quote: Go to Honda's website and read all the fine print. Or try the EPA's green vehicle guide and pay attention to sales areas and engine codes for all the different model of the hybrids. For example: http://www.epa.gov./greenvehicles/E-HONDA-CivicHybrid-04.htm The engine code 4HNXV01.35A6 (under vehicle specs) is the one sold here. Now look at the sales area for this engine code. The sales area that includes Virginia gets a 6 score...not very good. What the sales area really means is what gasoline is used for testing. Since California has the CARB gasoline that runs very clean, the car in that sales are gets a better score. For some idiotic reason, the 5 northeastern states that use CARB standards get that rating even though they don't sell CARB gasoline there. You can see how they are included in the sales area with California. For the rest of the country the rating is based on using regular gasoline. That's how we get the 6 rating here. Just to fully disclose all the details we do have reformulated gasoline in the metro DC area, but not the whole state. It is cleaner than regular gas, but not as clean as CARB gas. So the true rating here may be a 6 or 7. There is no way to know, but remember the other "normal cars" ratings would also increase with reformulated gas. Even if the Honda hybrid did get a 7 here, it still wouldn't be cleaner than a lot of other cars on the road. If you look at those rating you can also see how misleading the SULEV rating is. The other engine code is the cleaner version that is sold in California and gets their SULVEV rating. Notice how it get a 10 rating in CA while using CARB gasoline, but only an 8 while using regular gasoline. I always here people saying that their SULEV rated car is 90% cleaner than the average car. What they are saying is that their car running on CARB gas pollutes 90% less than the average car running on regular gasoline. This is comparing apples to oranges since the cars are running on different fuels. The SULEV rated Honda hybrid spits out 5-6 times as much pollution running on regular gas versus CARB gas and the average car would spit out a lot less pollution if run on the CARB gas instead of the regular gasoline. Just look at how many "normal cars" score a 10 in the California market! The public perception that hybrids are inherently cleaner than regular cars is a fallacy. Hybrids are only more fuel efficient, not cleaner running. Now if you want to take into account the environmental pollution related to having to procure more oil, then you might have an argument. But as far as air quality around the metro DC area is concerned, hybrids aren't helping one bit. They are actually hurting by inducing people to not bother carpooling. This is why they need to be removed from the HOV lanes, they aren't deserving of a clean fuel exemption. Sorry I keep repeating myself. But I'm hoping that if I keep repeating myself it will sink in to more people. |
|
Uhura
New Slug Joined: 10 Feb 2004 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
quote: This is really disappointing. I think most of us would hope that these vehicles are less damaging to the environment or that car makers are making an honest attempt to move in that direction... Live Long and Prosper |
|
sancochojoe
New Slug Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't think its the hybrids at all they just seem to be the easiest group to blame, because they are so visible to everyone.
I think its the increased amount of people moving into the suburbs due to the high cost of living closer to DC. Developments are sprouting up everywhere, south of DC. I would imagine the majority of the residents moving to the suburbs will be additional commuters driving on I-95 and HOV. So it would be logical to conclude that even if they dropped Hybrids from driving on the HOV lanes, congestion on the HOV lanes will continue to persist. Removing Hybrids is only a bandade solution to the real problem. As voters, focus should be put towards addressing the outdated 3 lane I-95 and the lack of alternate routes to move people south towards the Fredericksburg area. Maybe a revamping of Route 1 into an express way would help. The increased population in the suburbs is not going to decrease anytime soon and blaming Hybrids is the least of our problems. The more people moving towards Fredricksburg, the more trafic you will see on both the HOV and I-95. Especially if upgrade construction change on the HOV, I-95 and Route-1 remains static. It does not appear to be anytime soon. |
|
MDC
New Slug Joined: 04 Dec 2002 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
sancochojoe,
Hybrids are the #1 issue in the HOV, repeat HOV, lanes. Remove them and see how much HOV improves. Are you suggesting that they be ignored, and things left as-is, even though they are NOT even CLEAN FUEL cars? |
|
Stuck2
New Slug Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Originally posted by sancochojoe |
|
ScarletLSG
New Slug Joined: 27 May 2004 Location: HI Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Stuck2
I AGREE -- I AGREE -- I AGREE. More and better public transportation!!! I would LOVE LOVE LOVE to get up, put my butt on a train and get to work. Unless a person is going to the center of D.C. though, there really aren't any good public transportation options. I also think that a VERY important need is a BY-PASS AROUND the the NoVa/D.C./Baltimore area. All of the North/South coastal traffic MUST go straight through here to go up and down the coast, and that doesn't help at all. I've actually begun to believe that the rush hours aren't the worst times to travel here. Weekends and nights, I almost don't want to get on the road at all either. ScarletLSG >>Probably the only real solution to the traffic problem is a better public transportation systems = trains, light rail. Hybrids bear the brunt of everyone's ire because they are visible, so if you can pick up extra riders do so.<< |
|
Uhura
New Slug Joined: 10 Feb 2004 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
quote: A train system from the Potomac Mills area that fed dirctly into the Metro rail would be great, but would a train system change the "suburban feel" of the area? I'm kind of divided about this... Live Long and Prosper |
|
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 8> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |