|
AM HOV Sucks |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1 4567> |
| Author | |
cdatkins 
New Slug 
Joined: 24 Jun 2003 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 12 Jul 2005 at 8:58am |
|
You'd think it was...and it was well nigh impossible to get a ride today too. I thought with the surplus of slugs there was no way traffic would be bad...
|
|
 |
|
|
MDC
New Slug
Joined: 04 Dec 2002 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jul 2005 at 11:56pm |
|
I forgot to mention how much better it was on Wednesday [/sarcasm] Not a single accident or incident to look at either.
|
|
|
|
|
610toCrystalCity
New Slug
Joined: 06 Oct 2004 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Jul 2005 at 2:17pm |
|
Anybody know what the issue was with HOV lanes this morning?????? Traffic was slow from Springfield to Glebe road.
|
|
|
|
|
N_or_S_bound
New Slug
Joined: 20 May 2005 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Jul 2005 at 2:58pm |
|
Rain. SOVs. Monday.
NoSb SOV because you can, HOV because you care! |
|
|
|
|
emancilla
New Slug
Joined: 30 Sep 2003 Location: Virginia Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Jul 2005 at 3:02pm |
|
Two lanes were blocked because of an early accident in the regular lanes.
Traffic was pretty decent by 7:40am. |
|
|
|
|
NoSUV
New Slug
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 Jul 2005 at 3:54pm |
quote: Not SOVs! Unless, you want to blame the regular lane accident on SOVs. Oops - I guess it was SOVs - just not SOVs in the HOV lanes! |
|
|
|
|
KCWolfPck
New Slug
Joined: 12 Nov 2003 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Jul 2005 at 8:38am |
quote: Well, those Hybrids sure didn't help the situation. It felt to me like I was in a procession of nothing but Hybrids...as far as the eye could see. Can't wait for July 2006!!!![:I] |
|
|
|
|
NoSUV
New Slug
Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Jul 2005 at 9:26am |
|
Are you saying it was Hybrids that caused the accident? Shame on you
|
|
|
|
|
KCWolfPck
New Slug
Joined: 12 Nov 2003 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Jul 2005 at 9:54am |
quote: No, why would I say that? Wasn't the accident in the regular lanes?? All the Hybrids are in the what we used to call express lanes, but from this point forward I shall call them the exemption lanes. |
|
|
|
|
N_or_S_bound
New Slug
Joined: 20 May 2005 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Jul 2005 at 10:01am |
|
Let's get our terminology adjusted a bit. Let's address the OCCUPANCY status instead of the vehicle's technology. The challenge is those who travel with less than the requisite 3 in HOV-3 lanes. It doesn't matter how the car is built.
For anyone who doesn't think that additional vehicles on the road contribute to congestion, I'm wondering what their definition of congestion is? NoSb SOV because you can, HOV because you care! |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 4567> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options