Slug-Lines.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General Slugging Questions and Comments > General Slugging Topics
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - HOT question: tolls during non-rush hour
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

HOT question: tolls during non-rush hour

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Message
SpongeBob View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Location: VA
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SpongeBob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Aug 2005 at 12:30pm
--sigh--

Goober, there CANNOT BE separate HOV and Toll entrances. The enforcement of the toll and the tolling itself are linked and must take place at the same point. Otherwise, I can drive onto the lanes through the HOV entrance, put my Smarttag in the "sock" which keeps the gantries from reading it (this is how it is done, btw,) and go my merry way. The tolling gantry can't tell if I'm HOV or SOV, so what does it do? Why, it lets me pass for free, doesn't it. Because as far as it can tell, I'm HOV.

The difference between dinky little SR-91 and our system is that ours is intended to be multi-access and multi-route and multi-toll-boothed.

If there was a single entrance point on the system, and only a few exit points downstream from that, you could do HOV enforcement and tolling at that single point and it would work (while still discouraging ridesharing, of course.)

But on the system Fluor and Clark are proposing, it CANNOT BE DONE. They say as bloody much in their proposals! And VDOT has asked them, "Why don't you tell us how you plan to accomodate HOV?"

No answer has been given because there IS NO ANSWER.
Back to Top
Bob View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 14 Dec 2001
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Aug 2005 at 1:00pm
HOV enforcement will be a nightmare and I agree that with new entrance and exit points it makes it basically impossible. The only way it could be done would be to have the enforcement areas split into HOV and toll lanes (on the same ramp), ie, a two lane onramp or offramp. I dont see how that is possible from an engineering or practicality standpoint.

One of the companies said they are going to herd the HOVS into a separate lane for enforcement at the Pentagon, while the SOVs whiz by to the left. But how do you do that at 5 (?) different exit ramps?
Back to Top
SpongeBob View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 06 Oct 2004
Location: VA
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SpongeBob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Aug 2005 at 1:30pm
Even split ramps wouldn't work because who is there to enforce it? And how can the gantry tell if you paid or not? When your car passes under, the gantry registers your Smarttag and takes cash from your account. An SOV in a van could drive under without a Smarttag and then exit at the SOV ramp. Who's gonna know?

No, the only way a multi-access, multi-route, multi-tollbooth system works is if EVERYONE on it is charged on a per-mile basis. The engineers at Fluor and Clark know this. The marketers of HOT know it. The people at VDOT know it.

For a year I've asked here for working examples from comparable highway systems. I've written to experts asking about technological solutions to counting passengers. I've asked for people to offer answers on how to mix SOV and free HOV.

You know what I've learned?

No one has ever built such a complicated tolling system.
Experts admit no technology exists to count passengers.
HOV is indistinguishable from SOV: the toll charge will be same.
Back to Top
NoSUV View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NoSUV Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Aug 2005 at 3:21pm
Sponge, I know a much smaller scale system was used in San Diego for the Coronado Bay bridge. Toll booths were set up at one end, with the right lane for HOV. Tolls were manually collected, and traffic backed up for miles.
Back to Top
fryed_1 View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fryed_1 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 Aug 2005 at 3:28pm
I think they should issue neck braces with small explosive charges in them with coin slots. If you aren't wearing them when you enter the lanes, you get charges an exuberant amount of money. If you are wearing them you can safely make it onto the HOT/HOV lanes. If you try to cheat in any way by not paying toll, they explode sending your and your passengers' heads into orbit.

Seriously though, without massive construction or separating HOV/HOT lanes completely or manned toll booths (which would slow traffic horrendously and defeat the purpose of the highspeed lanes), I don't see how they could effectively govern those with 3 or more passengers from SOV.
Back to Top
Max_28756 View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 25 Feb 2004
Location: Va
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Max_28756 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Aug 2005 at 12:38pm
NoSUV,
I drove over that bridge for 3 years. It was HOV-2 with one lane to go through. You still had to slow so they could take a look. It became worse when a carrier was in port.
We are about to go through the same thing but increased 100 fold. The only people making these decisions don't drive the roads during the rush hour(s). They consider a traffic jam - hitting 3 red lights on their drive to the office. This whole HOT idea is so ridiculous it's maddening to even think it's being considered!
Back to Top
NoSUV View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NoSUV Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Aug 2005 at 12:57pm
Max, I think it comes down to the inability to solve the overall congestion problem. Tolls will allow the governemnt to control how many cars are in the express lanes, and then tell those in the regular lanes that they can pay if they don't want to sit in traffic, so quit complaining. Express lanes as they are now move at least 35 mph faster than the regular lanes, and that's WITH hybrids. Some hybrid owners are willing to pay for the priviledge of less congestion, and removal of the exemption mobilizes them to support tolls. The slug anti-hybrid exemption sentiment is partially responsible for this situation - this site was quoted by VDOT as rationale for recommending removal of the exemption. Delegates in the area also refer to slugs when making proposals to remove the exemption. Is it any wonder that the hybrid owners are pro-toll?
Back to Top
MDC View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MDC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 Aug 2005 at 8:16pm
NoSUV,
You haven't made the case that HOT reduces congestion even slightly. We do know that it will reduce ride sharing though.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.