Independence Day for Slugs NO MORE HYBRIDS |
Post Reply | Page <1 34567> |
Author | |
NoSUV
New Slug Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
quote: MDC - seems logical, even if not reality. I double check the computer by doing the math long hand - not too hard since denominator is such a small number, and the numerator fairly big. |
|
N_or_S_bound
New Slug Joined: 20 May 2005 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
One EXTREMELY important calculation that isn't being factored in is waste disposal.
I just sold a 1966 model vehicle. It runs great. It's not in a junk yard somewhere. It's a "conventional" combustion engine. Doesn't have all the latest safety features, but a good car. I have a 2000 Toyota Avalon. It is a 6 cylinder. Gets 27 mpg average based on my driving habits. It has all the latest safety features (at least enough to make it safe for quite a few number, 30?, of years to come). Does going out and buying a new or used vehicle simply because it's called a "hybrid" make sense to junk either of those fine vehicles above especially if I were to be overcome with the temptation to drive SOV in the HOV (which the law is finally catching up to a more common sense approach)? Selling my Avalon doesn't take it off the roads and do much/anything for emissions reduction since someone else is going to drive a comfortable and safe vehicle anyways? The only way to get my "pollution factory" off the road is to completely scrap it. Tear up every salvagable piece on it so it can't be recycled to keep other "gas guzzlers" on the road--hey, you don't wanna contribute to furthering others' polluting habits do you? So, if we scrap the "polluters", we're just filling up landfills with good machinery which could last for years as viable transportation. Some zealots of hybrids would argue to fill up the landfills (what you don't say is as important as what you do say!) with our current state of the art technology in order to make room for the "latest and greatest" technology. My Avalon is designed to last MANY more years, avoiding the landfill as long as feasible/economically practical. It's 7, maybe 8 years old (I bought it used). If it were a hybrid, it would be nearing the end of its service life and the batteries would need replacing. Which makes more practical sense in a HOLISTIC approach to being environmentally friendly. Oh yeah, when my Avalon travels N_bound or S_bound, it has at least 3 for HOV--sometimes there's maximum seating occupied (5 of us) and comfortably seated I might add. It's so easy to get fixated on some zealots petty rationale for hybrids and lose sight of the larger mosaic (big picture). Don't be fooled....marketers know how to manipulate your perceptions because they induce prejudices in your thinking without you even being aware of it. NoSb SOV because you can, HOV because you care! |
|
NoSUV
New Slug Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
NoSB: You need to continue your train of thought on "trickle down" economics. Although your used car may not leave the roads, it's possible that the person who bought that car dumped a worse one for it. The elimination of the worse one still makes a difference.
|
|
MDC
New Slug Joined: 04 Dec 2002 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
NoSUV,
Unless you drive a whole tank doing only highway speed, AND another whole tank with only city driving, your calculations are meaningless in this discussion. Of course you don't need a computer to figure your average MPG on a tank of gas. That's a no-brainer! You haven't proven that you get better MPG driving in one place over driving in another. That you can divide xxx miles by xx gallons is not relevant to your claim. |
|
NoSUV
New Slug Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
MDC: Actually, you likely need a refresher course in math and logic. Let me give you a simple example that even a 3rd grader should be able to understand.
Let's say you take 2 trips with just highway driving and 2 trips with mixed city and highway. For both trips with just highway driving, you go 500 miles and use 10 gallons. 500/10 = 50mpg highway. Now, with the mixed driving, you only go 450 miles and use 10 gallons. 450/10 = 45mpg. What you know for a fact is that the vehicle gets better mileage on the highway than city/highway. Since the variable is the city driving portion, you can logically infer that your vehicle gets better mileage on the highway than in the city. Thanks for reaffirming my definitions on a different post. |
|
N_or_S_bound
New Slug Joined: 20 May 2005 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
quote: If only this held true in ALL vehicles which are currently in existence you might have a leg or two to stand on. Consider viewing www.fueleconomy.gov and you might come to another conclusion from which to try to form the basis for a factually based conversation. Logical inferences break down in this case. Another consideration is just how "highway" driving is calculated. Does this include on/off ramp accel/decel from/to refuleing points? Or is this ONLY on the highway in order to remove the small discrepancy that may be induced in the calculations by driving from your home to the "highway" in order to start your trip? In summary, some vehicles get better fueleconomy in city driving than highway. NoSb SOV because you can, HOV because you care! |
|
MDC
New Slug Joined: 04 Dec 2002 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the "lesson". You do know your elementary school math for sure!
My point was that you can't depend on what your car's computer is telling you to be accurate. I don't see how your responses are related. |
|
SlugsB1tch2Much
New Slug Joined: 18 Apr 2006 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here is my question to all:
Hybrid or no hybrid, HOV or HOT, it seems that the main point here is the time utility that the HOV lane provides. I don't buy into environmental concern as the main reason for owning a hybrid. It would be naive to think that time did not have a money value and I respect the fact some people are willing to exploit this SOV capability (e.g. Why do people choose to fly instead of driving?). Furthermore, we should expect a very high influx of people into our area (that is, Northern Virginia) for many economic and government reasons (e.g. BRAC, increase of jobs, etc). What are some long-term solutions to this problem? Eliminating hybrids, motorcycles, etc as SOV vehicles will make a difference but not in the long run: the hybrid will ultimately still be used in accordance with HOV rules and regulations, people tend to own conventional vehicles as opposed to hybrids, and every highway, interstate has a limiting factor on how much traffic it can handle. It seems that a lot of you are trying to convince each other of the principle of the matter whether it is pro-environment or a matter of "buying your way out of a problem." For all you people whether pro-hybrid or anti-hybrid, you have failed to use a more relevant buzzword: sustainability. What are some long term solutions? My concise logic: Limit f(n) = M n->infinity where, n = number of people using HOV f(n) is the dynamic function that represents the capacity of the HOV lane (let me know if you want to help me with this) M = a maximum We will at some point experience a scenario in which P>M, where P = number of HOV uses. FINAL QUESTION: What do we do??? Long-term solutions, please. P.S. I noticed some math being thrown around, consider this: This could be a periodic trend and we will later experience regression to the mean. If this is true, then no legislation will solve the problem. I have done some mathematical modeling and any sort of external interference with the system will affect it short-term but not in the long-run. If anybody is experienced with this, please let me know if my assumptions (I have modelled this as a steady-state, stable, dynamic system) are incorrect. |
|
Bob
New Slug Joined: 14 Dec 2001 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If want information and help from the slug community, I suggest you drop your insulting user name and the attitude it conveys. I wouldn't go on a hybrid site and sign up with a name such as "hybrids are spoiled brats" and then ask the hybrid drivers their opinions.
|
|
SlugsB1tch2Much
New Slug Joined: 18 Apr 2006 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Please observe the inherent irony Bob, I slug and drive and therefore do not discount myself from a group that complains. Either way lets not get distracted, I believe I am asking a salient question.
|
|
Post Reply | Page <1 34567> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |