Bus firm takes car sharers to court
Printed From: Slug-Lines.com
Category: Archived Slugging Topics
Forum Name: HOT Lanes Discussion
Forum Description: Post messages regarding High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes here.
URL: http://www.slug-lines.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2010
Printed Date: 28 Apr 2024 at 10:29am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Bus firm takes car sharers to court
Posted By: dickboyd
Subject: Bus firm takes car sharers to court
Date Posted: 27 Jul 2005 at 9:07pm
Serves the cleaning ladies right for talking and eating in a car share situation. The cleaning ladies should have been jailed! [:-P] Parasitical competition indeed! The cleaning ladies should be ashamed. Ashamed, I say.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1525590,00.html
Bus firm takes car sharers to court
Kim Willsher in Paris
Monday July 11, 2005
The Guardian
They might have been congratulated for their "green" efforts in an
area of heavy air pollution.
Instead a group of French cleaning ladies who organised a car-sharing
scheme to get to work are being taken to court by a coach company
which accuses them of "an act of unfair and parasitical competition".
The women, who live in Moselle and work five days a week at EU
offices in Luxembourg, are being taken to court by Transports
Schiocchet Excursions, which runs a service along the route. It wants
the women to be fined and their cars confiscated.
Two years ago a business tribunal threw out the company's case. It is
now pursuing the women in a higher court, claiming that their action
has cost it €2m (£1.4m).
The women explained that for many years cleaners used the TSE line
for the 40-minute ride across the border, which cost them €110 (£76)
a month.
"Using our cars is quicker and at least twice as cheap. And on the
bus we didn't have the right to eat or even to speak," said Martine
Bourguignon. Odette Friedmann added: "In the evening instead of
coming to get us at 9.30pm the bus would arrive at 10.30pm. If you
made any comment to the driver you'd get a mouthful of abuse."
"It's absurd and ridiculous," said the women's lawyer, Cécile Klein-
Schmitt. "I don't see how any magistrate can find any legal basis for
this case."
TSE is also suing the women's employer, Onet-Luxembourg. "They've
basically accused us of inciting the car-sharing scheme when we have
nothing to do with the method of transport used by our staff," said
director Frédéric Sirerol.
The court case will be heard in January next year.
dickboyd@aol.com
|
Replies:
Posted By: MDC
Date Posted: 27 Jul 2005 at 9:40pm
|
I guess this is kinda HOT related. :D Crazy car-sharing schemers stealing all the profits from legitimate businesses.
|
Posted By: sluDgE
Date Posted: 28 Jul 2005 at 8:19am
.... and in NoVa, one could say that car sharering (AKA slugging) takes revenue from local mass transit providers (Metro, VRE, and all the commuter bus companies that serve PW, Stafford, and Spotsy counties). [B)]
Dick don't send this to Metro, they may get "ideas"! [;)]
Keep on sluggin'! [:)]
|
Posted By: 122582
Date Posted: 28 Jul 2005 at 10:52am
Since slugging is really just formalized hitchhiking, I doubt the mass transit companies would have a leg to stand on.
On the other hand, while we complain the bus companies don't have enough routes at convenient times, we effectively to take away from their ridership and revenue they would use to expand services.
|
Posted By: Wagonman
Date Posted: 28 Jul 2005 at 11:16am
|
Wow, can you say frivolous lawsuit? Why they are at it, why don't they sue all drivers that drive between those two points? Even if one of the carpoolers was making money off operating the route, this suit reeks or monopoly behaviour. This bus company needs to be sanctioned for their arrogance.
|
Posted By: SpotsySlugBug
Date Posted: 28 Jul 2005 at 12:05pm
|
A few cleaning ladies considered competition? So stupid. Does anyone know what if any law was actually broken? There couldn't possibly be any law on their books for this....
|
Posted By: Wagonman
Date Posted: 29 Jul 2005 at 11:33am
quote:
Originally posted by SpotsySlugBug
[br]A few cleaning ladies considered competition? So stupid. Does anyone know what if any law was actually broken? There couldn't possibly be any law on their books for this....
It sounds like they are trying to stretch some law against "unfair and parasitical competition". I'm sure the law was never intended for something like this. The law was probably meant to be used against companies that steal other company's customer lists and then try to gain their business. Or when an employee leaves a company and tries to open his/her own competing business and steals the former employers customers.
|
Posted By: 122582
Date Posted: 29 Jul 2005 at 1:58pm
|
well, this was in France. Not too surprising when you consider that.
|
|