Slug-Lines.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General Slugging Questions and Comments > General Slugging Topics
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - I-95S shut down
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

I-95S shut down

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
goober View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Location: VA
Status: Offline
Points: 2
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote goober Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2005 at 3:34pm
Thanks for the info Bob.

Goober
Back to Top
annsyp View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Location: VA
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote annsyp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2005 at 3:46pm
Freud-

I have noticed this same phenomenon. Since I don't get off work until 6 pm, I travel home slugless. Every single day at the HOV entrance (the one after the Springfield interchange), traffic backs up for over a mile, as every tries to get on the HOV, but once you are past that, the regular lanes are wide open and generally move faster then the HOV lanes (keep in mind, this is usually around 6:30 or 7).

My theory is that while traffic is fine up to 123 or so (where I happen to exit), it gets much worse after that, so the HOV ends up being faster for the whole trip, but if you aren't going very far down in the HOV lanes, it isn't worth the long wait to get on them in the first place.
Back to Top
TROLL View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TROLL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2005 at 3:54pm
What ever happened to the proposed plan of speed bumps on I-95?
Back to Top
Freud View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 02 Dec 2005
Location: VA
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Freud Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2005 at 4:07pm
Didn't someone mention that the speed bumps already existed on I-95? [:D]
Back to Top
frankiestein View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote frankiestein Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2005 at 4:09pm
Yeah, but we are going to need the state to add a few more.
Back to Top
Luddite View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Location: VA
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Luddite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2005 at 4:13pm
Very simple. HOV lanes are magic.
Back to Top
TROLL View Drop Down
New Slug
New Slug


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 0
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TROLL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Dec 2005 at 4:31pm
Did you know they have retractable speed bumps on the freeway now?
They are for ambulances and fire trucks.
Retracting Speed Bumps
Ever been in an ambulance and in a hurry?


Basically, the speed bump is constructed from low arch-shaped beams or something (some material that can support a tremendous amount of weight, obviously) and hooked up to a special mechanism activated by radio device/frequency. The bump would have the ability to retract into near flat-road status if the proper radio signal (or other appropriate signal technology) alerted it to do so. Designated vehicles -- ambulances, fire trucks, etc. -- would have the activating transmitter on their front bumper, and from a distance of about 100 meters or so, the bump would retract. This range of the transmitter could be adjusted, but one would have to give it plenty of time.

http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Retracting_20Speed_20Bumps
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.