VA enforces VA tint law on MD car |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
USA
New Slug Joined: 06 Jun 2002 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 21 Jul 2010 at 11:25am |
quote: I think the argument may be slightly different. I've seen people squawk about the tint issue on car chat boards and their beef seems to be that it's not fair to issue a ticket when their state allows a particular modification to the vehicle and it's one that is not easily reversed (i.e., you can't remove the tint, drive through Virginia, then put it back up--compare to a radar detector where you can easily turn it off and stick it in the trunk). There was a famous U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding Illinois's law applying to truck mud flaps. The Illinois rule rendered a mud flap design that was legal in at least 45 states illegal for use in Illinois; also, the banned design was specifically REQUIRED for use in at least one state (Arkansas). Several interstate trucking lines sued to enjoin the enforcement of the Illinois law on the basis that it was an unconstitutional infringement on interstate commerce. The matter went up to the Supreme Court and the trucking companies won, due in large part to the unreasonable cost of switching the mud flaps all the time because the Illinois law made it impossible to use one set of equipment that would comply with all states' laws. The opinion is Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc., 359 U.S. 520 (1959), and if you're interested you can find it at http://supreme.justia.com/us/359/520/case.html (the opinion begins where it says "Mr. Justice Douglas delivered the opinion of the Court"). The tint law is rather different from the one at issue in Bibb, though, because in the tint case it's very easy to comply with the tint laws in both Virginia and Maryland if you tint your windows to the Virginia standard. The mere fact that Maryland allows darker tint wouldn't by itself be enough of a reason to overturn the Virginia law, and the Bibb Court mentions this argument by noting several other cases involving things like truck weight limits on highways (where you can easily comply with everyone's law if you just comply with the minimum weight limit in any state). |
|
USA
New Slug Joined: 06 Jun 2002 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The tint law in Virginia (46.2-1052) allows 35% on the rear side windows and the rear window, 50% on the front side windows, and none (other than what might have been part of the OEM glass) on the front (the windshield/windscreen). The statute is not specific to Virginia-registered vehicles, so if your tint is darker than what the state law allows, you lose. There have been bills introduced in the General Assembly to make the statute apply only to Virginia-registered vehicles, but they have failed every time. (Congress has nothing to do with the matter. It's a state law, not a federal law.)
The logic of applying it to out-of-staters is that Virginia has determined that the tint levels prescribed in the statute are the darkest safe levels. (Note that I'm neither agreeing nor disagreeing with their conclusion.) A darker tint level does not become "safe" simply because the motorist comes from a state that allows for a darker level. |
|
lennydao
New Slug Joined: 21 Jun 2010 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
fnk1481
Take the ticket like a man or fight it in court. You sound so dumb posting this comment. |
|
wvuguy2004
New Slug Joined: 15 Oct 2009 Location: VA Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
My two cents....
You don't mention in your post whether or not the officer actually gave you a ticket. I'm assuming from the tone of your post, he did. Basically, any time you are operating a vehicle, you must conform to the standards of the state in which it is being operated. So if you are a resident of Maryland, but know that you will be frequenting VA, it would be wise to research what level of tint is legal in VA before having that tint applied. Is this whole thing a bit burdensome? Yes. The police officer's logic - Yeah, it's a bit flawed, and I think his analogy breaks down a bit. But I'll make a better one. I used to live in a location where studded snow tires were perfectly legal. However, I can not reasonable expect to drive them on the beltway. And yes, changing those tires was a bit of a hassle. But I needed to conform to the laws here. Also a bit of advice - a combative attitude is not helpful with law enforcement. Is it necessarily his business what you're doing in VA? No, not really. But he could have just as easily been looking for a reason NOT to write you a ticket. If you had perhaps explained that you reside in MD, but picked up slugs to go to VA because you wished to visit family in VA (or whatever reason applies to you), he may have very well let you off with a warning. In my experience, when you're being evasive, police tend to react negatively. Fair? No. Fact of life? Yes. |
|
sluDgE
Master Slug Joined: 27 Oct 2003 Status: Offline Points: 501 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
More tinting info ...
Here's a DMV website that describes allowable tinting of vehicle windows with/without medical waivers: http://www.dmv.virginia.gov/webdoc/citizen/medical/sunshading.asp The site says an owner must request and obtain a medical waiver from DMV BEFORE getting the windows tinted darker than allowed with no waiver. |
|
sluDgE
Master Slug Joined: 27 Oct 2003 Status: Offline Points: 501 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Appears that fnk1481 started posting on this b'board in the Spring and possibly moved to the Commonwealth from Maryland at about that time. So, fnk1481 could be a Virginia "newbie"!
In an effort to be helpful and educational ... here is a VA DMV website titled "New to Virginia?" that lists what fnk1481 (and all of us) must do (with associated time limits) to comply with Virginia vehicle registration laws: http://www.dmv.virginia.gov/webdoc/moving/newva.asp [:D] |
|
Jack Burden
New Slug Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You probably won't get much sympathy from a judge, but here is another analogy you could argue to the court -- enforcing the VA tint law against out of state drivers would be like requiring every out of state vehicle to comply with state inspection laws. Technically this breaks down becasue I would guess the statute says only vehicles registered -- as opposed to operated -- in VA must have state yearly state inspection.
|
|
Woodbridge Mike
New Slug Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
quote: Hah! Great research on this poster. Well, when you falsify your registration, driver's license, etc. to avoid paying the dreaded VA personal property tax, I guess it's not much more of a stretch to complain about having to follow Virginia's traffic laws. -Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt. |
|
jadams08
New Slug Joined: 07 Mar 2007 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
quote: LMAO!!!!![:D] |
|
usedcarsalesman
New Slug Joined: 07 May 2009 Status: Offline Points: 0 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
State laws are state laws - if you don't like them then stay out of that state. It's illegal to use a radar detector in Virgina also and "but I'm from Maryland" won't fly for that either. The officer could have easily handed you a scraper and insisted that you remove the tint on the spot or have the vehicle impounded - I've seen it done!
Also interesting from a previous post.. quote: But your vehicle is still tagged in MD? Sounds like you are gaming the system and got caught up in your own loophole search. On the upside...I hope the slugs who do choose to ride in your 2-door appreciate the car being clean, the radio being at a moderate level, etc. [8D] |
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |